Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract We review our current understanding of the rheological properties of the lower mantle based both on materials science and geophysics points of view. We assume a simple model of the lower mantle that is made of only two minerals: bridgmanite (Br) (Mg,Fe)SiO3and ferropericlase (Fp) (Mg,Fe)O, and address a question of (i) which mineral is weaker (lower viscosity), (ii) how does lower mantle viscosity change with depth and location, and (iii) discuss implications for shear localization. We first review plausible mechanisms of deformation based on the deformation mechanism map on the normalized stress and temperature space. We conclude that likely mechanism of deformation in the lower mantle is either diffusion creep or power-law dislocation creep. Based on this review, we discuss recently proposed models by Cordier and his group (Cordier in Nature 481:177–181, 2012; Cordier in Nature 613:303–306 , 2023) where either asthermal creep (i.e., low-temperature plasticity) or pure climb creep (not power-law dislocation creep) would play an important role. We conclude that these models are not acceptable because (1) many aspects of their models are incompatible with experimental observations and theoretical models of deformation of most materials including oxides and metals and (2) these models are not consistent with the distribution of seismic anisotropy. Hence, we focus on power-law dislocation creep and diffusion creep. We review previously published results on deformation (by dislocation creep) and diffusion, we conclude that Fp is weaker than Br. The radial (depth) depth and lateral variation of viscosity is discussed based on the estimated activation volume and estimated variation of grain-size. Geophysical studies suggest only modest depth variation of viscosity that demands relatively small activation volume (V* (< 3$$\times$$ 10–6m3/mol)). Plausible models to explain small activation volume are discussed including the role of extrinsic diffusion. Grain-size also controls viscosity if deformation is by diffusion creep. Okamoto and Hiraga (J Geophys Res, 2024. 10.1029/2023JB027803), Solomatov et al. (Phys Earth Planet Inter 129:265–282, 2002) estimated the grain-size evolution in the lower mantle based on the kinetics of grain-growth and the role of a phase transformation. In contrast, there are other papers (e.g., Paul et al. in Prog Earth Planet Sci 11:64, 2024; Rozel in Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 2012. 10.1029/2012GC004282) where grain-size distribution is estimated assuming that grain-size is controlled by dynamic recrystallization. The validity of assumption is questionable because dynamic recrystallization occurs due to deformation by dislocation creep but not by diffusion creep and the absence of seismic anisotropy indicates that diffusion creep dominates in most of the lower mantle. Finally, we review the published models of shear localization that would explain the long-term preservation of geochemical reservoirs in the lower mantle. Accepting that two minerals (Fp and Br) in the lower mantle have largely different viscosity, Ballmer et al. (Nat Geosci 10:236–240, 2017) proposed that the presence of regions of compositional difference (difference in Fp/Br ratio) leads to localized deformation (deformation mainly in the weaker regions). However, in addition to the ad hoc nature of this model, there is no strong evidence for the presence of large variation in Fp/Br in the lower mantle that makes the validity of this model questionable. There are some papers where processes of shear localization are explored without invoking the presence of regions of large rheological contrast. Thielmann et al. (Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 2020. 10.1029/2019GC008688) presented the results of theoretical study of deformation of initially homogeneous two-phase mixture (Fp and Br) and showed that deformation causes the elongation of a weak Fp that promotes shear localization. In this model, the rheological contrast between Fp and Br was assumed to be independent of strain. However, Cho and Karato (J Geophys Res 2022. 10.1029/2021JB022673 ; Phys Earth Planet Inter, 2024. 10.1016/j.pepi.2024 ) showed that when deformation is by diffusion creep, the rheological contrast increases with strain due to the evolution of stress concentration caused by grain elongation. They showed that this will promote strain weakening particularly in simple shear that would lead to shear localization. Consequently, the tendency for shear localization is stronger in their model than a model where rheological contrast is assumed to be independent of strain.more » « less
-
SUMMARY The occurrence of plate tectonics on Earth is rooted in the physics of lithospheric ductile weakening and shear-localization. The pervasiveness of mylonites at lithospheric shear zones is a key piece of evidence that localization correlates with reduction in mineral grain size. Most lithospheric mylonites are polymineralic and the interaction between mineral phases, such as olivine and pyroxene, especially through Zener pinning, impedes normal grain growth while possibly enhancing grain damage, both of which facilitate grain size reduction and weakening, as evident in lab experiments and field observations. The efficacy of pinning, however, relies on the mineral phases being mixed and dispersed at the grain scale, where well-mixed states lead to greater mylonitization. To model grain mixing between different phases at the continuum scale, we previously developed a theory treating grain-scale processes as diffusion between phases, but driven by imposed compressive stresses acting on the boundary between phases. Here we present a new model for shearing rock that combines our theory for diffusive grain mixing, 2-D non-Newtonian flow and two-phase grain damage. The model geometry is designed specifically for comparison to torsional shear-deformation experiments. Deformation is either forced by constant velocity or constant stress boundary conditions. As the layer is deformed, mixing zones between different mineralogical units undergo enhanced grain size reduction and weakening, especially at high strains. For constant velocity boundary experiments, stress drops towards an initial piezometric plateau by a strain of around 4; this is also typical of monophase experiments for which this initial plateau is the final steady state stress. However, polyphase experiments can undergo a second large stress drop at strains of 10–20, and which is associated with enhanced phase mixing and resultant grain size reduction and weakening. Model calculations for polyphase media with grain mixing and damage capture the experimental behaviour when damage to the interface between phases is moderately slower or less efficient than damage to the grain boundaries. Other factors such as distribution and bulk fraction of the secondary phase, as well as grain-mixing diffusivity also influence the timing of the second stress drop. For constant stress boundary conditions, the strain rate increases during weakening and localization. For a monophase medium, there is theoretically one increase in strain rate to a piezometric steady state. But for the polyphase model, the strain rate undergoes a second abrupt increase, the timing for which is again controlled by interface damage and grain mixing. The evolution of heterogeneity through mixing and deformation, and that of grain size distributions also compare well to experimental observations. In total, the comparison of theory to deformation experiments provides a framework for guiding future experiments, scaling microstructural physics to geodynamic applications and demonstrates the importance of grain mixing and damage for the formation of plate tectonic boundaries.more » « less
-
Abstract High pressure and temperature experiments were carried out on the oxide mixtures corresponding to the bridgmanite stoichiometry under the hydrous shallow lower mantle conditions (24–25 GPa and 1673–1873 K with 5–10 wt. % of water in the starting material). Oxide mixtures investigated correspond to MgSiO3, (Mg, Fe)SiO3, (Mg, Al, Si)O3, and (Mg, Fe, Al, Si)O3. Melting was observed in all runs. Partitioning of various elements, including Mg, Fe, Si, and H is investigated. Melting under hydrous lower mantle conditions leads to increased (Mg + Fe)O/SiO2in the melt compared to the residual solids. The residual solids often contain a large amount of stishovite, and the melt contains higher (Mg,Fe)O/SiO2ratio than the initial material. (Mg + Fe)O‐rich hydrous melt could explain the low‐velocity anomalies observed in the shallow lower mantle and a large amount of stishovite in the residual solid may be responsible for the scattering of seismic waves in the mid‐lower mantle and may explain the “stishovite paradox. Since stishovite‐rich materials are formed only when silica‐rich source rock (MORB) is melted (not a typical peridotitic rock [bulk silicate Earth]), seismic scattering in the lower mantle provides a clue on the circulation of subducted MORB materials. To estimate hydrogen content, we use a new method of estimating the water content of unquenchable melts, and also propose a new interpretation of the significance of superhydrous phase B inclusions in bridgmanite. The results provide revised values of water partitioning between solid minerals and hydrous melts that are substantially higher than previous estimates.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
